SHOWstudio

Design and New Media

Graphics, new media, architecture and more

CFDA trying to "CHANGE" the FASHION SYSTEM ' The failed economy is temporarily jolting the system and soon again there will be a steady hand on FASHION AND ITS ESSENCE".

Showing messages 11–15 of 15
KaWai
KaWai
United States
In reply to Galileo's Universe:

But that's a survey conducted in 2001. What's that got to do with what people have to deal with today-they are trying to keep their health insurances and trying to pay their rent and mortgages. I think H&M, Topshop are doing fine because they provide fashionable clothes in prices people could afford, in this harsh economic climate, quality is not the top priority in clothes. High end retailing has to slash their prices in order to attract customers(Loehmann's a discount department store specializes in selling US and European high end brand named merchandise is still doing very well), or they have to rely on Chinese or Middle Eastern wealthy tourists. Many specialty boutiques in my area are going out of business. There have been four women's boutiques on one block that have gone out of business in the last six months, that block is on a busy Ave in a middle class neighborhood in Berkeley. This is the time when almost every kind of retail business is suffering. Almost every restaurant, businesses been down 20 precent. People are just trying to hold on to what they already have, not accumulating more stuff if it's not absolutely necessary.

Reply to this >



Galileo's Universe
Galileo's Universe
Greenland

PIC;REF;>PIC:www.huffingtonpost.com/ the-blog/2009/06/02/

The kern theme of the subject was ' THE FASHION SYSTEM ' , the article in question was meant to illustrate consumers' attitude in general, almost a decade ago in the matters of purchasing 'quality fashion', read high end of FASHION retailing .... the economic crisis is something very recent that has jolted the 'system' and that people, (understandably) is forced to buy cheap today across the whole spectrum of consumption because of the very precarious financial situation .... that is a rather different matter ... the consequences ... as I see it.

People are NOW confronted with a different reality when deciding to do their purchasing because of their rather limited disposable income /capital and can no longer permit themselves to buy as they wish where they wish .... even if they want to .... just logic !

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States
In reply to Galileo's Universe:

The problem now with retail-too much inventory, nobody feel safe to spend. In the meantime the collections are still coming out as usual.

http://www.wwd.com/retail-news/crisis-in-fashion-1892754//

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States
In reply to Galileo's Universe:

I think people are more sensible about how to spend their money in a recession, before they didn't ask why a Donna Karan dress would cost 3000 dollars, now if they were to buy a DK dress, they would ask what makes it cost that much.

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States

There is another time ticking bomb in the US-if the health care crisis is not come to a solution, retail would continue to suffer due to it. Middle class would spend too much to keep their health plan they would cut spending on clothing and any luxury item. More than 7 millions Americans have lost their jobs(not including workers who have had their work hour slashed who don't have healthcare already), This is not just a systematic problem with CFDA, the US fundamental problem is much deeper than this current jolt. If US can't come up with a national healthcare similar to European and some Asian developed countries, this would be the disease that drags down almost every sector in the society.

Reply to this >



Showing messages 11–15 of 15


You must Log-in to post a message to this thread.

SHOWstudio © 2009 Terms & Conditions